Human Rights, Policy, Global South Guest User Human Rights, Policy, Global South Guest User

Interdisciplinary Approaches to Human Rights: History, Politics, Practice

(Routledge, 2018)

Edited By Rajini Srikanth and Elora Halim Chowdhury

9781138482265.jpg

(Routledge, 2018)

Edited By Rajini Srikanth and Elora Halim Chowdhury



Interdisciplinary Approaches to Human Rights: History, Politics, Practice is an edited collection that brings together analyses of human rights work from multiple disciplines. Within the academic sphere, this book will garner interest from scholars who are invested in human rights as a field of study, as well as those who research, and are engaged in, the praxis of human rights.

Referring to the historical and cross-cultural study of human rights, the volume engages with disciplinary debates in political philosophy, gender and women’s studies, Global South/Third World studies, international relations, psychology, and anthropology. At the same time, the authors employ diverse methodologies including oral history, theoretical and discourse analysis, ethnography, and literary and cinema studies. Within the field of human rights studies, this book attends to the critical academic gap on interdisciplinary and praxis-based approaches to the field, as opposed to a predominantly legalistic focus, drawing from case studies from a wide range of contexts in the Global South, including Bangladesh, Colombia, Haiti, India, Mexico, Palestine, and Sudan, as well as from Australia and the United States in the Global North.

For students who will go on to become researchers, practitioners, policy makers, and activists, this collection of essays will demonstrate the multifaceted landscape of human rights and the multiple forces (philosophical, political, cultural, economic, historical) that affect it.

Read More

Contested Transformation: Race, Gender & Political Leadership in 21st Century America

(Cambridge University Press, 2016)

By Carol Hardy-Fanta

image-asset.jpg

(Cambridge University Press, 2016)

By Carol Hardy-Fanta



Contested Transformation constitutes the first comprehensive study of racial and ethnic minorities holding elective office in the United States at the beginning of the twenty-first century. Building on data from the Gender and Multicultural Leadership (GMCL) National Database and Survey, it provides a baseline portrait of Black, Latino, Asian American, and American Indian elected officials - the women and men holding public office at national, state, and local levels of government. Analysis reveals commonalities and differences across race and gender groups on their backgrounds, paths to public office, leadership roles, and policy positions. Challenging mainstream political science theories in their applicability to elected officials of color, the book offers new understandings of the experiences of those holding public office today. Gains in political leadership and influence by people of color are transforming the American political landscape, but they have occurred within a contested political context, one where struggles for racial and gender equality continue.

  • Provides detailed findings on the backgrounds and political trajectories of elected officials of color by race and gender giving academics access to new information needed for their research

  • The book's compelling narrative of contested transformation makes it accessible to a wide audience, from students to political activists to media commentators

  • Explores topics currently under debate such as immigration policy, voting rights, and the death penalty, being relevant for the 2016 US Presidential election and beyond

Read More
Economics, Gender Studies, Policy Guest User Economics, Gender Studies, Policy Guest User

Gender and Risk-Taking: Economics, Evidence, and Why the Answer Matters

(Routledge, 2017)

By Julie A. Nelson


Julie Nelson.png

(Routledge, 2017)

By Julie A. Nelson

The belief that men and women have fundamentally distinct natures, resulting in divergent preferences and behaviours, is widespread. Recently, economists have also engaged in the search for gender differences, with a number claiming to find fundamental gender differences regarding risk-taking, altruism, and competition. In particular, the idea that "women are more risk-averse than men" has become accepted as a truism. But is it true? And what are its causes and consequences?

Gender and Risk Taking makes three contributions. First, it asks whether the belief that men and women have distinct risk preferences is backed up by high quality empirical evidence. The answer turns out to be "no." This leads to a second question: Why, then, does so much of the literature claim to find evidence of "difference"? This, it will be shown, can be attributed to biases arising from too-easy categorical thinking, widespread stereotyping, and a tendency to prefer results that are publishable and that fit one’s prior beliefs. Third, the book explores the economic implications of the conventional association of risk-taking with masculinity and risk-aversion with femininity. Not only fairness in employment, but also the health of the financial sector and national responses to climate change, this book argues, are being compromised.

This volume will be eye-opening for anyone interested in gender, decision-making, cognition, and/or risk, especially in areas relating to employment, finance, management, or public policy.


Read More