About
Board and Staff
GCWS Overview Aspects
Our Mission
Our History
Publications
Member Institutions
Jobs
Events
Upcoming Events
Feminisms Unbound
Women Take The Reel
Graduate Student Conference
Previous Events
For Students
Courses
Micro-Seminars
Registration & Application Info
Cross-Registration
Academic Policies
Conference Organizing Team
Writing Prize
For Faculty
Teach a course
Teach a Micro-seminar
Faculty Database
Contact Us
Contact Us
GCWS Location
Board And Staff

GCWS The Consortium for Graduate Studies in Gender, Culture, Women, and Sexuality at MIT

About
Board and Staff
GCWS Overview Aspects
Our Mission
Our History
Publications
Member Institutions
Jobs
Events
Upcoming Events
Feminisms Unbound
Women Take The Reel
Graduate Student Conference
Previous Events
For Students
Courses
Micro-Seminars
Registration & Application Info
Cross-Registration
Academic Policies
Conference Organizing Team
Writing Prize
For Faculty
Teach a course
Teach a Micro-seminar
Faculty Database
Contact Us
Contact Us
GCWS Location
Board And Staff

Tainted Witness: Why We Doubt What Women Say About Their Lives

Leigh Gilmore.png

(Columbia University Press, 2017)

By Leigh Gilmore

In 1991, Anita Hill's testimony during Clarence Thomas's Senate confirmation hearing brought the problem of sexual harassment to a public audience. Although widely believed by women, Hill was defamed by conservatives and Thomas was confirmed to the Supreme Court. The tainting of Hill and her testimony is part of a larger social history in which women find themselves caught up in a system that refuses to believe what they say. Hill's experience shows how a tainted witness is not who someone is, but what someone can become. 

Why are women so often considered unreliable witnesses to their own experiences? How are women discredited in legal courts and in courts of public opinion? Why is women's testimony so often mired in controversies fueled by histories of slavery and colonialism? How do new feminist witnesses enter testimonial networks and disrupt doubt? Tainted Witnessexamines how gender, race, and doubt stick to women witnesses as their testimony circulates in search of an adequate witness. Judgment falls unequally upon women who bear witness, as well-known conflicts about testimonial authority in the late twentieth and early twenty-first centuries reveal. Women's testimonial accounts demonstrate both the symbolic potency of women's bodies and speech in the public sphere and the relative lack of institutional security and control to which they can lay claim. Each testimonial act follows in the wake of a long and invidious association of race and gender with lying that can be found to this day within legal courts and everyday practices of judgment, defining these locations as willfully unknowing and hostile to complex accounts of harm. Bringing together feminist, literary, and legal frameworks, Leigh Gilmore provides provocative readings of what happens when women's testimony is discredited. She demonstrates how testimony crosses jurisdictions, publics, and the unsteady line between truth and fiction in search of justice.

Law, United States, Violence, Activism / Social Movements / ResistanceGuest UserNovember 9, 2018Book
Facebook0 Twitter LinkedIn0 Reddit Tumblr Pinterest0 0 Likes
Previous

Recovering Armenia: The Limits of Belonging in Post-Genocide Turkey

Guest UserNovember 9, 2018
Next

Women in Global Science: Advancing Academic Careers through International Collaboration

Academia, STEM, Policy, Activism / Social Movements / ResistanceGuest UserNovember 9, 2018Book

Search the GCWS site:


Follow us:

We respect your privacy. We use your information exclusively for GCWS emails. We do not send unnecessary email, because no one needs a cluttered inbox.

 

© Copyright 2018 GCWS, The Consortium for Graduate Studies In Gender, Culture, Women, & Sexuality.  All rights reserved.